eight by walking in park and Munaaf has been and will always be hopeless while Gopu (Sreesanth's nickname) was as usual aggresive and took the first and important important wicket of Watson. Though a little undisciplined before Sreesanth has put himself in Game now and had performed well today. I wonder why some people have problem with aggression of Sreesanth??? I ADMIRE IT. Infact, aggression is requisite after talent to win over strong oppositions in sports. It is better to try and fail but not try at all, Sreesanth does put 100%. I doubt selector's decision to rank him below lousy Nehra and lazy Munaf. I suggest he shall be ranked 2nd fast bowler after Zak in this WC. Critics and pros are welcomed.
days leave at the start of an onsite assignment was bit difficult to digest, no group of friends around to hang out I still had a good time, met couple of old buddies, made some new and visited few places. Fireworks at London Eye was a experience of its kind, after standing four hours straight with icy cold weather it was worth waiting. Over the next few weekends I am planning to visit some famous places. Last week I visited Madame Tussuad's museum, what a place you can get yourself pictured with stars, good thing is they don't move and you can get as many pictures as you want.For this analysis, I have considered only two kind of people: people from technical background and MBAs. I believe rest are so less in numbers they can be ignored.
What I have seen over the last few years is, people from technical background while studying technical degrees like B.E. or B.TECH. (CS), have thought of becoming a software engineer in a reputed MNC, which if they pass out from an average institute, eventually achieve in less than 2 years. Then what? Then they just follow the ladder which their manager has gone through or has setup for them. This would be called bottoms-up approach. I would call it as a myopic, unadventurous and poor in dream quotient. My gut feel data is 80% of IT professionals from technical background would fall in this category having poor dream quotient.
On the other side, what MBAs learn in B-school is always from a point of view of an organization or CEO. When we are studying we often come across words like "Will you ever as a leader would ......?" I would call it as top-down approach. Unfortunately, we never see any problem as an individual trying to keep ball away from his court (indeed it is a top quality in IT, but we would take that later). Even if an MBA starts from the lowest level in an organization, his eyes would always be at what top management is doing. Dream quotient of an MBA is very high.
Along with the dream quotient, there is a pile of things which I could be pointed out as different in these two sides such as communication, presentation, orientation etc. (later more on this)
In field of IT, you will find more no. of people who belong to the first side. If they reside at a leader's position, do hinder the growth of second side. This can happen if you are in a services company & are living in trap of billing from client.
I thought, this difference can be helpful for the new entrants and people sitting in placements choosing script writers of their future. So, shared it.
I at personal level, am confident enough to find a way out.
